Public administration is a statecraft which guides the state activities and the scope of state activities has always been a debatable issue in democratic societies. There are also evidences that a varied level of concern for public welfare has always been there in the minds of kings with certain exceptions even before the emergence of modern democratic state. The post modern world, as a result of contingent factors, has witnessed radical changes especially in the nature, scope and mode of state-citizens relationships. The present day societies have become more demanding especially in terms of the need for better management of their basic and specific affairs. It calls for an optimum understanding of public expectations and possessing appropriate skill for their rational prioritization, establishing and operating a public management for fulfilling those with in the constitutional and legal framework and that is also as per the values and ethics of the society has become a challenge not only for the governance, administrators but also the academics in the field of Public Administration, Public Management, Political Science, Law and Sociology. The journal of Public Affairs and Governance (PAG) will strive to understand this in a right manner. Public Affairs and Governance is research driven, peer reviewed, publication aimed at searching the developments taking place in public affairs and their governance. The research paper and articles in the journal are both conceptual and empirical one. The audience of the journal includes academics, policy makers and practitioners, non-governmental organizations, public services and development, local self governance institutions and institutions dealing with natural resource management. The journal is interdisciplinary and primarily covers the issues related to the disciplines like Public Administration, Public Management, Public Policy, Political Science, Law and Sociology etc.
Indexed/Abstracted with - NAAS Rating 2024 - 3.16, Indian Citation Index, EBSCO Discovery, Google Scholar, CNKI Scholar, J-Gate, ISRA-JIF, IIJIF, Indian Science, DRJI, I2OR, ESJI, Scientific Journal Impact Factor, InfoBase Index, and Cite Factor.
Aims & Scope
Vision
Public Affairs and Governance, the bi-annual refereed journal is an rndeavour to look into different dimensions of Public Affairs, Public Administration, Public Management ,Public Service and other matters related to the governance.
Scope
The journal Public Affairs and Governance invites research papers, review articles, notes on fact finding and analytical research reports /studies etc. related to different aspects of public affairs, public administration, public management, public service and governance. The papers need not only be technical but should certainly add significantly to the existing body of knowledge and/or present a different perspective. Readability and sustaining the reader’s interest is an important criterion. Research based articles are strongly encouraged but focus should be on analysis and recommendations cutting down on technical aspects. Policy papers, best practices and case studies, creative concepts and applications, book reviews, commentaries, interviews and other thought provoking manuscripts are strongly encouraged. The manuscripts that address interdisciplinary topics or approach “traditional” topics from interdisciplinary perspective will be highly encouraged.
Editorial Board
Editor-in-Chief
Prof. Ajmer Singh Malik,
Vice Chancellor,
Chaudhary Devi Lal University,
Sirsa, Haryana
President,
Indian Public Administration Association,
Department of Public Administration,
Kurukshetra University,
Kurukshetra-136119,
Haryana, India.
Email: publicaffairs.governance@gmail.com
Associate Editor
Dr. Govind Kumar Inakhiya,
Associate Professor,
CRCAS,
School of International Studies,
Jawaharlal Nehru University,
New Delhi-110067.
Email: govindkjnu@gmail.com
Editorial Board Members
Prof. A Venkatraman,
Department of Public Administration,
VN South Gujarat University,
Surat-395007.
Email: vkcv091@gmail.com
Prof. Anil Monga,
Centre for Police Studies,
UIEASS,
Panjab University
Chandigarh-160014.
Email: mongaak@rediffmail.com
Prof. B.L. Sah,
Director, UGC-HRDC,
Kumaon University
Nainital-263139.
Email: blsah_Nainital@rediffmail.com
Prof. C.R. Suthar,
Department of Public Administration,
Mohan Lal Sukharia University,
Udaipur-313001.
Email: sutharcr@yahoo.com
Prof. Kazi S.M. Khasrul Alam Quddusi,
Department of Public Administration,
University of Chittagong,
Chittagong-4331,
Bangladesh.
Email: kkhasru@gmail.com
Prof. Manoj Dixit,
Department of Public Administration,
Lucknow University,
Lucknow-226007.
Email: manojdixit123@gmail.com
Prof. Prem Kumar,
Department of Sociology,
Kurukshetra University
Kurukshhetra-136119.
Email: pkkuk@yahoo.com
Prof. Renu,
Department of Public Administration,
Punjabi University,
Patiala-147002.
Email: rennuganesh@gmail.com
Prof. S.S. Dahiya,
Department of Public Administration,
MD University,
Rohtak-124001.
Email: ssinghdahiya67@gmail.com
Prof. S.K. Mahajan,
Department of Public Administration,
Himachal Pradesh University,
Shimla-171005.
Email: mahajan4949@gmail.com
Prof. Y. Pardhasaradhi,
Director,
RCUES,
Osmania University,
Hyderabad-500007.
Email: pardha_y@yahoo.com
Assistant Editor
Dr. Sandeep Inampudi,
Coordinator & Assistant Professor,
Department of Public Administration,
Central University of Karnataka,
Karnataka.
Email: sandeep.inampudi@gmail.com
Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
Manuscripts submitted to the Public Affairs And Governance (PAG) are evaluated entirely on the basis of their scientific content. There are no publication charges. All possible measures are taken to uphold the highest standards of publication ethics and to prevent malpractices. Authors who submit papers to our Journals attest that their work is original and unpublished and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. In addition, authors confirm that their paper is their own original work, that has not been copied or plagiarized, in whole or in part, from other works and if the authors have used the works of others the same has been appropriately cited or quoted. Our publication ethics and malpractice statement is based on the guidelines for journal editors developed by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Duties / Responsibilities of Editors
The Editorial Team of the PAG, comprising the Editorial Board and the Editorial Staff with the Publisher is responsible for taking a decision as to which of the articles submitted to the journal are to be published. The Editors have complete discretion to reject/accept an article. The Editorial Team may confer/deliberate with other reviewers/editors in arriving at its decisions. The evaluation of manuscripts is made on the basis of their scholarly and intellectual content without having regard to the nature of the authors or the institution including gender, race, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors. The journal follows a policy of fair play in its editorial evaluation. The editors are expected to exercise caution and ensure that they have no conflict of interest with respect to the articles they accept/reject. The editors and the editorial staff follow strict confidentiality and are required not to disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to any one other than the corresponding author, reviewers and the publisher. Authors are encouraged to correct the errors which are found during the process of review while preserving the anonymity of the reviewers.
Duties / Responsibilities of Reviewers
Editorial decisions are based on peer review. The reviewers are expected to maintain absolute confidentiality with regard to the contents of manuscripts. The reviews are to be conducted objectively and the referees are expected to express their views clearly with supporting reasons. The reviewers should have no conflict of interest with the authors and the subject matter of the research. The reviewers are required to identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any observation or argument which has been previously reported should also be accompanied along with the relevant citation. Similarities or overlaps between the manuscript under review and any other published paper of which the reviewer may have personal knowledge, may also be brought to be attention of the editors. The information or ideas obtained through peer review are of a privileged nature and must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative or other relationship with any of authors or institutions connected to the papers.
Duties/Responsibilities of the Authors
Authors are required to present an accurate account of the original research work and also an objective discussion of its significance. The paper should contain sufficient details of the literature and references. It is expected that all the authors have significantly contributed to the research. Fraudulent and knowingly made inaccurate statement constitutes unethical behavior and would be unacceptable. Authors are required to ensure that the submitted work is original and has not been published elsewhere, and if the authors have used the work of others the same has been appropriately cited or quoted. Applicable copyright laws and conventions are required to be followed. Copyright materials should be reproduced only with permission and due acknowledgement. Authors are not expected to submit manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently would constitute unethical practice and would be unacceptable. Proper acknowledgement of the work of others must always be made. Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the paper which is submitted for publication. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Others who have participated in certain substantive aspects in the development of the paper should also be acknowledged. The corresponding author is required to ensure that all co-authors are included in the paper, and that the co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication. All sources of financial support should also be disclosed. Upon discovery of any significant error in the published work, it is the responsibility of the authors to promptly notify the editors and cooperate in the retraction or correction of the paper.
Peer Review Policy for the Public Affairs And Governance
The practice of peer review is to ensure that only good science is published. It is an objective process at the heart of good scholarly publishing and is carried out by all reputable scientific journals. Our reviewers therefore play a vital role in maintaining the high standards of the Public Affairs And Governance and all manuscripts are peer reviewed following the procedure outlined below.
Initial manuscript evaluation
The Editors first evaluate all manuscripts. In some circumstances it is entirely feasible for an exceptional manuscript to be accepted at this stage. Those rejected at this stage are insufficiently original, have serious scientific flaws, have poor grammar or English language, or are outside the aims and scope of the journal. Those that meet the minimum criteria are passed on to experts for review.
Authors of manuscripts rejected at this stage will be informed within 2 weeks of receipt.
Type of Peer Review
The Public Affairs And Governance employs single blind review, where the reviewer remains anonymous to the authors throughout the process.
How the reviewer is selected
Reviewers are matched to the paper according to their expertise. Our reviewer database contains reviewer contact details together with their subject areas of interest, and this is constantly being updated.
Reviewer reports
Reviewers are asked to evaluate whether the manuscript:
Is original
Is methodologically sound
Follows appropriate ethical guidelines
Has results which are clearly presented and support the conclusions
Correctly references previous relevant work
Reviewers are not expected to correct or copyedit manuscripts. Language correction is not part of the peer review process. Reviewers are requested to refrain from giving their personal opinion in the "Reviewer blind comments to Author" section of their review on whether or not the paper should be published. Personal opinions can be expressed in the "Reviewer confidential comments to Editor" section.
How long does the peer review process take?
Typically the manuscript will be reviewed within 2-8 weeks. Should the reviewers' reports contradict one another or a report is unnecessarily delayed a further expert opinion will be sought. Revised manuscripts are usually returned to the Editors within 3 weeks and the Editors may request further advice from the reviewers at this time. The Editors may request more than one revision of a manuscript.
Final report
A final decision to accept or reject the manuscript will be sent to the author along with any recommendations made by the reviewers, and may include verbatim comments by the reviewers.
Editor's Decision is final
Reviewers advise the Editors, who are responsible for the final decision to accept or reject the article.
Special Issues / Conference Proceedings
Special issues and/or conference proceedings may have different peer review procedures involving, for example, Guest Editors, conference organisers or scientific committees. Authors contributing to these projects may receive full details of the peer review process on request from the editorial office.
Becoming a Reviewer for the Public Affairs And Governance
If you are not currently a reviewer for the Public Affairs And Governance but would like to be considered as a reviewer for this Journal, please contact the editorial office by e-mail at publicaffairs.governance@gmail.com, and provide your contact details. If your request is approved and you are added to the online reviewer database you will receive a confirmatory email, asking you to add details on your field of expertise, in the format of subject classifications.
Please contact subscription@indianjournals.com for Archive prices
Author Guidelines
Vision
Public Affairs and Governance, the bi-annual refereed journal is an rndeavour to look into different dimensions of Public Affairs, Public Administration, Public Management ,Public Service and other matters related to the governance.
Scope
The journal Public Affairs and Governance invites research papers, review articles, notes on fact finding and analytical research reports /studies etc. related to different aspects of public affairs, public administration, public management, public service and governance. The papers need not only be technical but should certainly add significantly to the existing body of knowledge and/or present a different perspective. Readability and sustaining the reader’s interest is an important criterion. Research based articles are strongly encouraged but focus should be on analysis and recommendations cutting down on technical aspects. Policy papers, best practices and case studies, creative concepts and applications, book reviews, commentaries, interviews and other thought provoking manuscripts are strongly encouraged. The manuscripts that address interdisciplinary topics or approach “traditional” topics from interdisciplinary perspective will be highly encouraged.
Public Affairs and Governance plans to publish the contributions in the following categories:
Policy: Submission in this section should discuss issues of policy framework and macro environment constructs that affect or are likely to affect issues related to governance administration and also the experiences of policy implementation at regional, national or global level so that interested readers may be benefitted accordingly.
Research: This category of papers / report shall be on any type of research- quantitative or qualitative undertaken by author(s). The research may involve the construction or testing of a model or framework. It may also be an action research, market research or survey based one, empirically tested, scientific or analytical one. Suitable encouragement will be accorded to a paper based on comparative study. The contributions likely to be published in the journal must be a work enriching the existing body of knowledge or leading in refining the practice of a profession or an activity.
Concept: The conceptual papers would present premise, make suggestions, develop and test hypothesis. These papers are likely to be discursive and may cover philosophical discussions and comparative studies of thought.
Review: Papers of this category are usually categorised into two classes. First, namely literature reviews, are typically critique of the literature related to a particular issue of academic or practitioner interest. The articles of this kind intend to see the development of thought and analysis of different viewpoints to throw up a pertinent question or converge to an opinion. Authors’ analysis is welcome in particular. Second type is the general reviews which are more general in nature and may provide an overview or historical examination of certain concept, technique, policy, programme/scheme, phenomenon or an institution. These are likely to be more descriptive or instructional (“how to” papers) than discursive.
Case studies: We look forward to two types of cases. One is the case studies of decision making, administrative process, evaluation of public management institution or practice or execution of a policy/progamme/scheme and associated experience. The others are the firm level cases that raise a debate or highlight on a typical decision making situation that is generalisable and related to already established body of theoretical knowledge. Smaller firm level case studies demonstrating best practice or results of policy shall also be entertained in Best practice and/ or Practitioner notes category.
Shorter communications of 1500-3000 words are welcome for following categories:
Viewpoint: This is envisaged as a forum to share imagination and opinions. These shorter communications rely on contents that draw on author beliefs and interpretations. Typical journalistic pieces can find a place in this section.
Best practice: Short communications are a platform to report and share best practices in governance and allied areas that have an educational value for other practitioners and may become fruitful to resolve the problem encountred.
Notes: Others who have a significant experience of working with and for administration -consultants, academics, researchers, and administrators may contribute to this section. These notes are likely to benefit the readers from the experience of such individuals. The papers must highlight the challenges faced by the practitioners and opportunities available to individuals and organisations in administration and academics. The Notes must have some recommendations which are tactical in nature and me able to resolve the problem.
Concern: Entrepreneurs and others may raise relevant issues through this section. A complete (not lengthy) description of the challenge faced can be shared here. This may typically help to initiate a dialogue or research endeavours to seek answers to these pressing concerns.
Book reviews: Terse and lucid reviews of books targeted at start up and those useful for public administration and related subjects are also acceptable. In addition to the publication details of such books, the body of review should highlight objectives and/or overview of the contents of the book; and attributes, achievements and limitations of the book. The review must summarise for whom the book is suitable and for what purposes. Publishers may also send two copies of their publication to the editor for getting the book reviewed by the scholars in the field.
Review Process
Each submission to PAG shall be subjected to the following review process:
It shall be reviewed by the editor for general suitability for publication.
If it is considered suitable, two reviewers are selected and a double blind review process shall be adopted.
Based on the recommendations of the reviewers a decision is taken as to whether the article is accepted as is, returned for revision or rejected.
All articles submitted for publication shall be got reviewed within 10 weeks of their receipt so as to avoid annoyance caused to contributors on account of excessive response times.
Preparing Manuscripts
Articles are not restricted to a certain length however, those of 4,000 to 5,000 words are considered proper (Policy, Research, Concept, Review, and Case study sections). Shorter contributions of 1500 to 3,000 words are also invited for inclusion in Viewpoint, Best practice, Notes, Book reviews and Concern sections of the journal (suitable work may include innovative examples of entrepreneurial behaviour and discussion of policy related issues). Following must be kept in mind while preparing manuscripts for the Public Affairs and Governance.
Cover page: The cover page should contain only and only title, structure, abstract, key words, autobiographical note and contact details.
Title: Please suggest a title of not more than ten words, and an auto-biographical note. A brief autobiographical note should include full name, affiliation and contact address including e-mail id and fax number (if any).
Keywords: Authors should also provide up to 5 keywords or descriptors that clearly describe the subject matter of the article as these help to describe the subject content of an article to prospective readers and to index the article for retrieval from a database or bibliography.
The main body of manuscript starts from second page and should conform to following details. Always use UK English.
Headings: These should be typed in capitals and should not be numbered. Sub-headings should be typed in upper and lower case.
Footnotes: These should be used as sparingly as possible and if used should be numbered consecutively and will be listed at the bottom of the page.
Figures, Charts and Diagrams should be kept strictly to a minimum. They should be provided both electronically and as good quality originals. They must be black and white with minimum shading and numbered consecutively using Arabic numerals.
Artwork should be either copied or pasted from the origination software into a blank Microsoft Word document, or saved and imported into a blank Microsoft Word document. Artwork created in MS PowerPoint is also acceptable. Artwork may be submitted in the following standard image formats: .eps Postscript, .pdf – Adobe Acrobat portable document, .ai -Adobe Acrobat portable document, .wmf – Windows Metafile. If it is not possible to supply graphics in the formats listed above, authors should ensure that figures supplied as .tif, .gif, .jpeg, .bmp, .pcx, .pic, .pct are supplied as files of at least 300 dpi and at least 10cm wide.
In the text, the position of a figure should be shown by typing on a separate line the words "take in Figure 2". Authors should supply succinct captions. For photographic images good quality original photographs should be submitted. If submitted electronically they should be saved as .tif files of at least 300dpi and at least 10cm wide. Their position in the text should be shown by typing on a separate line the words "take in Plate 2".
Tables: These should be typed on a separate sheet of paper and numbered consecutively and independently of any figures included in the article. Each table should have a number in roman numerals, a brief title, and vertical and horizontal headings. In the text, the position of the table should be shown by typing on a separate line the words “take in Table I” etc.
Citation and Referencing
Enterprise shall subscribe to Harvard Style for citation and referencing. Authors should cite publications in the text: (Adams, 1997) using the first author’s name. At the end of the paper, a reference list in alphabetical order should be supplied.
For books: surname, initials (year), title of book, publisher, place of publication. e.g. Fulbright, A. and Khan, G. (2001), Competing Strategies, Outhouse Press, Rochester, NJ.
For book chapters: surname, initials (year), “chapter title”, editor’s surname, initials, title of book, publisher, place of publication, pages. e.g. Bessley, M. and Wilson, P. (1999), “Marketing for the Production Manager“ in Levicki, J. (ed.), Taking the Blinkers off Managers, Broom Relm, London, pp. 29-33.
For journal articles: surname, initials (year), “title of article“, journal name in full, volume and/or issue number, pages. e.g. Greenwald, E. (2000), “Empowered to serve”, Management Decision, vol. 33 no. 5, pp. 6-10.
For electronic sources: If available online, the full URL should be supplied at the end of the reference along with the date of access.
Abstract
Abstract not only introduce readers to the paper, they also help the author with a self check. We appreciate a structure abstract as suggested by Emerald. To produce a structure abstract for the journal please evaluate the following fields about your paper and this is also the abstract that we require. Abstracts should contain no more than 250 words. Write concisely and clearly. The abstract should reflect only what appears in the original paper. It should touch upon following points:
Purpose of this paper
What are the reason(s) for writing the paper or the aims of the research?
Design/Methodology/Approach
How are the objectives achieved? Include the main method(s) used for the research. What is the approach to the topic and what is the theoretical or subject scope of the paper?
Findings
What was found in the course of the work? This will refer to analysis, discussion, or results.
Practical implications (if applicable)
What outcomes and implications for practice, applications and consequences are identified? Not all papers will have practical implications but most will. What changes to practice should be made as a result of this research/paper?
What is original value of paper?
What is new in the paper? State the value highlights of the paper.
Submission
Preferred method of submitting manuscripts is through electronic mail to the Editor. Submission should be made in Word .doc or .rtf formats. Do not disclose your identity anywhere in the paper except on the cover page. Always indicate which category of submission you are making. Editor/ referees can suggest a change of category.
While submitting electronically always mention in the subject line: Enterprise/Author name/ first three words in the title.
In case manuscript is submitted via surface mail, submit three hard copies which must accompany paper on CD in the desired format. Ensure that file is free of viruses. It is generally good to create a folder and one copy each inside and outside the folder is safe.
Submit to: publicaffairs.governance@gmail.com
(216.73.216.189)